I became acquainted with neo-Eurasianism back in the 1990s. Neo-Eurasianism is not just a development of classical Eurasianism, “a synthesis of original Eurasian ideas, or rather intuitions, with European traditionalism, geopolitics and a conservative revolution in the spirit of the New Right.” This synthesis combined various variations of the "left" and "right" in the face of the main enemy - liberalism: "the traditions of Russian conservatism (from the Slavophiles, Dostoevsky and Leontiev), the ideas of populism, social justice, anti-bourgeois and anti-capitalist criticism of the New Left, the avant-garde civilizational project , which denies the unipolar world and offers an alternative model of the world order, based on the multipolar concept of "great spaces". Neo-Eurasians complement classical Eurasianism with traditionalism (R. Guenon, J.

Evola, T. Burkhardt, A. Korben, M. Eliade, etc.), the ideas of the “conservative revolution” (O. Spengler, W. Sombart, K. Schmitt, A. Möller van den Broek, E. Junger, F. Hielscher, E. Nikisch and others) and the “new right” (A. de Benoit, R. Stoykers and others), the “new left” (J. Bataille, J. - P. Sartre, G.

Debord, M. Foucault, J. Deleuze), neo-Marxism (A. Gramsci, D. Lukács and others), geopolitics (H. Mackinder, K. Haushofer, G. Lohausen, N. Spykman, Z. Brzezinski, J. Thiriart and others), structuralism (K. Levy- Strauss, R. Jacobson, F. de Saussure), Heidegger's fundamental ontology, sociology (E. Durkheim, M.

Mauss, L. Dumont, etc.), sociology of the imagination (J. Durand), analytical psychology (C. Jung), economics of the "Third Way" (F. Liszt), economic theories of S. Gesell, F. Schumpeter, F. Leroux. As for the criticism of the West, if the classics of Eurasianism attacked the Romano-Germanic civilization, then, given the current situation, neo-Eurasians see a danger in the Anglo-Saxon world, in England and the USA.

In the works of neo-Eurasianists, we are talking about opposition to Atlanticism, thalassocratic, mondialism, and liberalism. Continental Europe (Romano-Germans) is generally perceived positively, as capable of political cooperation. An important component of neo-Eurasianism is the thesis of a paradigm transition from Modern to Postmodern.